Writing Task 2 Model Answers
WRITING
14. Mobiles
Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries, shops and on public transport.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Essay Plan:
Opinion: Partially agree.
Main Idea 1: Noise from mobile phones can be disruptive or annoying.
Sub-idea A: People need to concentrate on reading, work etc. in some places e.g. libraries.
Sub-idea B: Many people want to relax in public places e.g. trains.
Main Idea 2: A complete ban is not the solution.
Sub-idea A: Difficult to enforce the ban.
Sub-idea B: Unfair to those who use their phones responsibly.
Main Idea 3: A better solution is to promote responsible mobile usage in public.
Sub-idea A: Public awareness campaigns and signs could encourage polite use.
Sub-idea B: Designated areas for usage could be created.
Model Answer:
In recent years, mobile phones have become ubiquitous in society, with almost everyone owning at least one. However, there are some who believe that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops, and public transport. In this essay, I will argue that while there are certain drawbacks to mobile phone use in public places, an outright ban is not the most effective solution.
To begin with, the use of mobile phones in public places can be disruptive to those around them. For example, in a library, the sound of a ringing phone or the buzzing of notifications can be distracting and disturb those who are trying to concentrate on reading or studying. Similarly, on public transport, people may be trying to relax or read a book, and in-app sounds, ringtones or simply someone talking loudly can be irritating and intrusive. In these situations, a ban on mobile phones may seem like a logical solution to this discourteous behaviour.
However, I believe that a complete ban on mobile phones in public places is not the most effective solution. For one thing, it would be difficult to enforce, especially in large public spaces like train stations or shopping centres. Furthermore, it would be unfair to those who use their phones responsibly and considerately. For example, someone who is sending a quick text on a messaging application or checking their social media feed quietly should not be penalised for the behaviour of others who are being loud and obnoxious.
Instead of a ban, a better solution would be to promote responsible mobile phone use in public places. This could be achieved through public awareness campaigns and signs in public places reminding people to keep their phones on silent mode, and encouraging people to use headphones when listening to music, streaming videos or making phone calls. Additionally, individuals could be asked or even required to use their phones in designated areas, such as phone booths or quiet rooms in libraries, to minimise any disruption to others.
In conclusion, while mobile phone use in public places can be disturbing, a blanket ban is not the most effective solution. Instead, raising awareness about polite use through education campaigns and creating special areas for phone use is a better way to minimise disruption to others while still allowing the many benefits of mobile phones.
*To see definitions and examples of the vocabulary in bold, along with practice exercises, go to Topic Vocabulary & Exercises.